will be offering selected optics from stock with serialized
print outs (just like the sample of the 10" f/6 mirror
below). Computer-aided interferometry is the most accurate
method used today for optical analysis... PERIOD. Accept
NO SUBSTITUTION!!. Please contact us if you are interested
in this specialized report. Tell us what size optic you
are looking for and if it's not in stock, we'll let you
know when it will be. We will forward to you, via e-mail,
the test report so you may inspect it prior to purchase.
The price will be higher than those listed on our web page.
We will also manufacture any optic we sell with the computer-aided
data analysis, pricing will vary depending on the size of
the optic. We will test any optic up to 24" and provide
detailed documentation of our results, inquire for pricing/lead
is incredibly accurate and precise. When combined with computer
- aided analysis software, you get a true representation of the
optic under test. The software can "read" several hundred
or even several thousand points on a optic or system, where as someone
reading an optic with a Foucault tester is checking only 4 to 6
zones (not really points). The software can also combine multiple
interferograms (3 are used in this example) of the same optic and
average several together. Typically, 2 to 8 interferograms are
used for the data average depending on the size of
optic under test.
our optics are hand figured against an over size optical flat
mirror, this set up is called a double-pass, auto-collimation
test. We incorporate the use of a Foucault and Ronchi test to
reduce visible error to the very minimal amount possible, once
we reach this point are we done yet?, maybe and maybe not.........
This is where the computer aided interferometry comes into play.
Optics that exhibit a good test result under the double-pass/auto-collimation
may in fact have errors greater than one would generally accept.
Straight lines with a Ronchi screen may indicate a good (qualitative)
optic, but just how good (quantitative)? When an interferometer
is placed into the test the "bands" or fringes will
usually exhibit a lot more bumps and dips, curves and bends than
one would see with the other testers.
Why is this? Well, the interferometer is just that much more sensitive.
It measures the wave front of the optic. It shows far more detail than
other types of testers, this is why it is the only preferred method
of testing accepted by serious purchasers of fine optics.
Lets take a closer look at the example; it exhibited straight
"bands" with a Ronchi test under a double-pass/auto-collimation
test (see photo) and a smooth surface with a Foucault test. So
lets see how the interferometer rates the same mirror.
the lines aren’t straight!
optic tested 1/5 wave at the wave front, an excellent optic. Despite
the very respectable report you can see that the "bands"
or fringes are not straight. It is very difficult to get straight
fringes with interferometry, it is THAT SENSITIVE. Please do not
confuse Ronchi-grams (that others may supply) with interferograms,
they are not the same thing. I have included one Ronchigram (bottom
right) so you can compare it with the interferograms.
three interferograms (left) were combined and averaged
together to achieve the data results. All images are of
the same mirror.
When reading data there are really three items to look at,
1) RMS - this should be 0.075 or lower (smaller).
2) Strehl ratio - this should be 0.80 or higher.
3) PVWF - this should typically be about 0.250 or better,
but remember this is the difference between the highest
and lowest point on a optic. An optic can have a greater
PVWF rating and still be a great mirror if the RMS and Strehl
is best to judge an optic in the above order, with RMS and
the Strehl ratio being the most important data to be concerned
with as they represent the entire surface. It is very possible
to have a mirror with a PVWF greater than 0.250 (1/4 wave)
and it still will be a fine optic, passing the star test
and giving detailed views of the planets. Remember, the
RMS and Strehl numbers will give the best over-all view
of the quality of the optic or system under test.
Do not buy into the hype of the overly inflated PV claim,
most do not have interferometry to verify their own work
and if they did they would not advertise the numbers that
they do. We recently tested a mirror from another maker
that was claimed to be 1/47 PVWF and had "documentation"
to prove it. It tested out very well at 1/5 PVWF, a very
fine mirror, but not 1/47 wave. Testing optics with a Foucault
tester at radius of curvature and comparing 4 to 6 zones
will not give a "truly" accurate depiction of
the optic, plus the human element of actually reading the
zones becomes a factor in achieving unbiased test data.
CONTACT US BY PHONE TO ORDER OPTICS